Evaluasi Proposal Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa (PKM) Menggunakan Sistem WP
Keywords:
Decision Support System, WP, Student Creativity Program, Proposal AssessmentAbstract
The evaluation procedure for Student Creativity Program (PKM) projects necessitates an objective and efficient methodology to analyze several aspects. This project seeks to establish an evaluation system utilizing the Weighted Product (WP) approach to deliver transparent and quantifiable rankings of proposals. The review utilized five primary criteria: thematic relevance, innovation and creativity, technological feasibility, potential impact, and program sustainability, each assigned predetermined weights. Data from ten proposals were evaluated utilizing the WP approach, encompassing the phases of decision matrix normalization, preference value computation, and ranking. The findings indicated that Proposal 4 garnered the highest preference value (4.939), succeeded by Proposal 5 (4.889) and Proposal 2 (4.876), establishing them as the foremost recommendations for funding. The WP technique shown efficacy in improving the efficiency and impartiality of the PKM proposal selection process. This method's implementation can be utilized in other programs with comparable assessment difficulties
References
[1] N. A. Safitri Yusuf, M. Mustikasari, and M. Hasrul H, “Determination of Priorities for the Development of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Province of South Sulawesi Using the Weighted Product Model,” J. Comput. Eng. Electron. Inf. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2023, doi: 10.17509/coelite.v2i1.57083.
[2] C. Rizal, S. R. Siregar, S. Supiyandi, S. Armasari, and A. Karim, “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product (WP) Dalam Keputusan Rekomendasi Pemilihan Manager Penjualan,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 312–316, 2021, doi: 10.47065/bits.v3i3.1094.
[3] C. Priatama and I. Pratama, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Blt Menggunakan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (Waspas),” J. Sist. Inf. dan Bisnis Cerdas, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 9–18, 2022, doi: 10.33005/sibc.v15i2.19.
[4] L. J. Satriani, H. A. Wulandari, P. N. Arifa, and I. Tahyudin, “Weighted Product Method in the DSS for Employee rewards at the Cosmetics Warehouse,” Internet Things Artif. Intell. J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 188–197, 2023, doi: 10.31763/iota.v2i3.567.
[5] A. Sinaga and D. Maulana, “Implementation of Weighted Product Method for Evaluating Performance of Technicians,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 30–42, 2022, doi: 10.5815/ijmecs.2022.04.03.
[6] M. C. Fazry, F. Helmiah, and S. Sudarmin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Pegawai Teladan Menerapkan Metode Weighted Product (WP),” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 847–855, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2135.
[7] S. Lucey, S. Sridharan, and V. Chandran, “A link between cepstral shrinking and the weighted product rule in audio-visual speech recognition,” 7th Int. Conf. Spok. Lang. Process. ICSLP 2002, no. 1, pp. 1961–1964, 2002, doi: 10.21437/icslp.2002-443.
[8] W. Hutahaean and P. Hasugian, “Sistem Pendukung Kelayakan Calon Penerima Bantuan Bedah Rumah Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” J. Nas. Komputasi dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 113–117, 2021, doi: 10.58794/santi.v2i1.47.
[9] E. A. Putra and S. Subandi, “Implementasi Algoritma Weighted Product Untuk Pencarian Karyawan Terbaik,” J. Teknol. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 96–100, 2020, doi: 10.36294/jurti.v4i1.1250.
[10] A. T. Sumpala, M. N. Sutoyo, H. Azis, and F. T. Admojo, “The weighted product method and portfolio assessment in ranking student achievement,” Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 148–154, 2021, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v13i2.827.148-154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal Research on Computing Knowledge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
