Optimasi Pengelolaan Data Mahasiswa dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium

Muh. Nurtanzis Sutoyo; Muh. Hajar Akbar; Alders Paliling; Mardianto Mardianto

Authors

Muh. Nurtanzis Sutoyo Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
Muh. Hajar Akbar Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
Alders Paliling Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
Mardianto Mardianto Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Keywords:

Decision Support System, SAW, Laboratory Assistant Selection, Data Normalization

Abstract

The selection of laboratory assistants is a crucial process that requires decision-making based on various criteria, such as academic performance, activeness, technical skills, and communication abilities. However, manual processes often face challenges such as subjectivity and inefficiency. This study aims to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) based on the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method to optimize the selection of laboratory assistants. We utilize the SAW method because it can integrate criterion weights and normalize data to produce objective preference values. We conducted a simulation using dummy data from 10 students and four criteria, applying weights determined through discussions with laboratory managers. The results show that student A5 achieved the highest preference score (1.000), reflecting optimal performance across all criteria. The developed system also demonstrated its ability to enhance the transparency, efficiency, and accuracy of the selection process. The implementation of this system offers a practical solution for managing student data and making fairer decisions, with potential applications in other selection contexts, such as scholarships or academic awards

References

[1] M. Sousa, M. F. Almeida, and R. Calili, “Multiple criteria decision making for the achievement of the un sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review and a research agenda,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 8, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13084129.

[2] I. Emovon and O. S. Oghenenyerovwho, “Application of MCDM method in material selection for optimal design: A review,” Results Mater., vol. 7, no. June, p. 100115, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rinma.2020.100115.

[3] A. Rasadi, B. Hidayat, and T. Ophiyandri, “Decision support system in determining the priority of disaster mitigation infrastructure development in villages level using the Simple Additive Weight (SAW) method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 708, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/708/1/012065.

[4] S. D. Jayanti, Budiman, and T. P. Yoga, “Comparison Analysis of the SAW Method and TOPSIS Method in the Decision Support System for Determining Permanent Teachers in SMK Pasundan 2 Banjaran,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1115, no. 1, p. 012016, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1115/1/012016.

[5] A. Fadlil, I. Riadi, and Y. Mulyana, “Integration of Fuzzy C-Means and SAW Methods on Education Fee Assistance Recipients,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 4, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v8i2.1636.

[6] N. Kumar, T. Singh, Grewal, A. Patnaik, and G. Fekete, “A novel hybrid AHP-SAW approach for optimal selection of natural fiber reinforced non-asbestos organic brake friction composites,” Mater. Res. Express, pp. 1–21, 2021.

[7] M. Safaripour and N. R. Andabili, “Miyandoab flood risk mapping using dematel and saw methods and dpsir model,” Adv. Environ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 131–138, 2020, doi: 10.22104/AET.2020.4766.1287.

[8] K. Alkaradaghi, S. S. Ali, N. Al-Ansari, J. Laue, and A. Chabuk, “Landfill site selection using MCDM methods and GIS in the Sulaimaniyah Governorate, Iraq,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 17, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11174530.

[9] S. Valipour Parkouhi, A. Safaei Ghadikolaei, and H. Fallah Lajimi, “Resilient supplier selection and segmentation in grey environment,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 207, pp. 1123–1137, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.007.

[10] S. Gül, “Fermatean fuzzy set extensions of SAW, ARAS, and VIKOR with applications in COVID-19 testing laboratory selection problem,” Expert Syst., vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.1111/exsy.12769.

[11] M. A. Kasri and H. Jati, “Combination of K-Means and Simple Additive Weighting in Deciding Locations and Strategies of University Marketing,” Khazanah Inform. J. Ilmu Komput. dan Inform., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 132–141, 2020, doi: 10.23917/khif.v6i2.11281.

[12] Mardiawati and A. Pradipta, “Penerapan Metode SAW untuk Evaluasi Kinerja Karyawan di Sektor Pendidikan,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2024.

[13] Arysespajayadi, N. Miftachurohmah, and M. A. Manuhutu, “Penerapan Metode SAW untuk Penentuan Pemenang Lomba Desain Grafis,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2024.